by Darius Galbinasu
Abstract: An investigation into the booming industry of children’s online videos, featuring global giant Cocomelon and Romania’s LooLoo Kids, reveals a sharp conflict between commercial success and child welfare. While creators market their content as wholesome “edutainment” and a respite for parents, psychologists warn it’s as addictive as slot machines.
The analysis uncovers a hyper-stimulating formula—rapid cuts, intense colors, and repetitive music—that experts link to impaired executive functions, developmental delays, and dependency in young children. LooLoo Kids’ founder defends his platform but admits the content lacks formal psychological validation. Despite emerging EU regulations and WHO guidelines urging limited screen time, this multi-billion-view industry thrives, pitting massive online profits against the developmental health of its vulnerable audience.
In one of the most popular YouTube videos on the platform, little baby Johhny sneaks out of his playroom on a mission to ransack a sugar jar but is caught in his tracks by his grandpa. In the animation that has racked up over 7 billion views, bright images and soft melodies roll across the screen, typically while overstretched parents get some respite to tackle chores.
The channel behind the wildly popular video, which originated in Romania, has hundreds of millions of subscribers and a vast offering of similar clips that keeps children occupied and entertained – but there is a darker side to this otherwise seemingly innocent world.
“A child is captivated by such songs. During that time you can prepare their meal … or get something else done around the house.” says Eduard, a young father. Another mother adds: “I believe the majority of mothers, to persuade their child to eat, will leave them in front of a device.”
While the entrepreneurs behind it claim to ensure that all of their videos delivered to the screens of infants is wholesome and educational, academic studies contradict these claims, and experts assert that children’s screen exposure can have adverse effects.
The demand for entertaining, soothing content designed to hold infants’ attention, however, is growing but also bitterly debated and contested by psychologists who believe such videos can foster dependency in similar ways to gambling and potentially harm child development. At the same time there is no undisputed evidence that content creators or the platform willingly and knowingly put out harmful content.
During our research, we discovered that of YouTube’s top five most-viewed videos of all time, which together have amassed 37 billion views, four are aimed at preschoolers – children under three years old. One of the most popular channels on YouTube, Cocomelon, is the global market leader with over 200 billion views and 200 million subscribers. It owns two of the top-five videos.
Two widely known animations among young children and parents are the roughly two-minute videos with catchy tunes such as “Baby Shark” and “Johny Johny Yes Papa” – which between them have garnered over 20 billion views and generate millions in revenue.
The Cocomelon channel is owned by a company with financial backing from the world’s largest alternative investment firm, Blackstone, which manages assets exceeding $1 trillion.
But it is not merely an American story. One of its biggest competitors is based in Romania.
Romania’s Digital Empire for Preschoolers
In 2012, Alexandru and Cristina Badan, parents based in the northeastern city of Iasi, grew frustrated by the lack of Romanian-language animations catering to preschoolers, so they made their own.
The result was TraLaLa and LooLoo Kids – which, between them, have amassed 130 million subscribers. Through distribution contracts, LooLoo Kids’ content has entered traditional media, being broadcast by TV networks in major markets such as Mexico and Brazil, and has even collaborated with international stars like Snoop Dogg.
“Our children grew up with TraLaLa, I wish … to be able to help raise our grandchildren also with the aid of TraLaLa,” Alexandru Balan told Context.
But psychologists remain unconvinced and have warned of adverse effects.
“Neural dependency”
Marius Zamfir, a Romanian psychologist who has studied the impacts that screen time can have on young children, argues that the fast-paced, bright-coloured YouTube animations aimed at children lead to a dependency resembling addiction.
“Children are drawn to movement, to colors, to the frequency modulation of sound and image,” he said. “We have a natural reflex for the brain to try to balance the movement and arrange it internally – and thus this neural dependency is created.”
After analyzing YouTube’s top five videos using AI, we found that a combination of key traits, such as perpetually moving images, intensely saturated colors, and repetitive melodies, might be the key to large viewer numbers. We emphasize that this was a small-scale analysis, and it does not carry the weight of a scientific study.
Educational or addictive?
Badan defends his content as being both educational and entertaining.
“The musical structure is intentionally repetitive and simple because this approach supports memorization and learning in young children,” he said. “Our songs cover themes such as the alphabet, numbers, colors, animals, good manners, or daily life activities. Our goal is to create memorable, enjoyable, educational content for the entire family.”
“We believe the use of the term addiction is an exaggeration,” he added. “On the contrary, we know psychologists who utilize our animations in activities with children with special needs.”
For this article, Context analyzed around 50 studies conducted over the last 20 years, and spoke with experts in psychology.
Dependency and withdrawal
The hyper-stimulating content activates the brain’s reward system through the release of dopamine, a mechanism similar to that in substance or behavioral addictions.
Parents frequently describe intense tantrums when the screen is taken away. Researchers recognize in these manifestations classic symptoms of withdrawal, such as loss of control and irritability upon interruption of the stimulus.
“Just nine minutes of exposure to fast-paced cartoons resulted in diminished executive function in preschool-aged children,” a 2011 study by the American Academy of Pediatrics found. “The rapid succession of stimuli overwhelms the brain’s capacity to process information efficiently, resulting in a decreased attention span and difficulties with self-regulation.”
Regulation lags behind
In some countries, such as France, prohibitions have been introduced regarding the exposure of children under three to screens. Germany is investing in digital education campaigns for parents and children.
The World Health Organization has also issued several recommendations. They include zero screen time for children under 18 months old, a maximum of one hour a day for children between 2-5 years old – viewed together with an adult, and to deactivate the autoplay feature, which rolls from one video to the next. Other guidelines include no screens at the dinner table or in the bedroom.
At the European Union level, the Digital Services Act requires very large online platforms like YouTube or Facebook to actively assess and mitigate risks to minors’ physical and mental health.
The European Commission said in response to some questions sent by Context, that online platforms must “identify and mitigate the systemic risks that their services might pose to users or society, including for the protection of minors, for the well-being of users.”
S-INFO PODCAST
The S-INFO podcast gives voice to the winners of the S-INFO Award, who share how they carried out their investigations in collaboration with civil society organisations. Guided by their mentors, the journalists take us behind the scenes of their work—exploring methods, challenges, and partnerships that made their stories possible.
Listen to Darius Galbinasu: